New questions about old heritability estimates

38Citations
Citations of this article
8Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

This note summarizes the main results of three recent studies on the heritability of mental traits: (1) The inferences Jinks and Fulker (1970) derived from Shields’s (1962) twin data are invalid since the assumptions of the genetic model are consistently violated by these data. A purely environmental model fits them better by a factor of 2. (2) Holzinger’s heritability coefficient (h2) is invalid since his derivations imply that dizygotic twins share no genes. (3) In contrast, Nichols’s (1965) heritability coefficient (HR) follows from a strictly additive genetic model. (4) However, the needed assumptions are consistently violated by Osborne’s (1980) personality data, which produce an excessive number of inadmissible HRs. A purely environmental model fits these data better by a factor of 14. Jointly, these results suggest that heritability estimates of mental traits in the literature should be viewed with caution. © 1989, The Psychonomic Society, Inc.. All rights reserved.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Schönemann, P. H. (1989). New questions about old heritability estimates. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 27(2), 175–178. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03329932

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free