Biomaterials in craniofacial surgery: Experimental studies and clinical application

56Citations
Citations of this article
40Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

The increasing variety of biomaterials available to the craniofacial surgeon today, with advantages of "off-the-shelf availability" and lack of donor-site morbidity, provides a formidable armamentarium for applications in reconstruction and augmentation. Although biomaterials are invaluable alternatives to autogenous bone graft, there is lack of uniformity in clinical application. In this article, we review our experience with the use of hydroxyapatite derivatives in animal studies and subsequently discuss our experience with the use of 3 classes of biomaterials (cement pastes, osteoactive biomaterials, and prefabricated polymers) for craniofacial reconstruction. We subsequently offer guidelines to dictate the choice of biomaterials for different applications, based on the site of reconstruction (onlay versus inlay reconstruction) and skeletal maturity. © 2009 Mutaz B. Habal, MD.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Chim, H., & Gosain, A. K. (2009). Biomaterials in craniofacial surgery: Experimental studies and clinical application. Journal of Craniofacial Surgery. Lippincott Williams and Wilkins. https://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0b013e318190dd9e

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free