A study of the effects of anisokinetic sampling

56Citations
Citations of this article
25Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

The results of a numerical investigation of sampling bias through cylindrical probes are presented for both iso-and anisokinetic conditions for thin- and thick-walled probes. Laminar flow fields are calculated using a finite-difference solution of the Navier-Stokes equations; particle trajectories are then calculated with a fourth-order Runge-Kutta method to integrate the particle equation of motion. An ultra-Stokesian drag law and particle interception are included in the calculation. Based on a dimensional analysis of the problem and on the assumptions of the physical model, five dimensionless groups, Re, Ʉ/U0, D/d, St, and ρ/(ρpC) are identified that specify the aspiration coefficient, Ai=Ȼ/Ca. Systematic investigations show that the tube Reynolds number, Re, and the slip-modified density ratio, ρ/(ρpC), have only a minor influence in determining Ai. Calculations are made to determine the influence of the remaining groups—velocity ratio (Ʉ/UB), diameter ratio (D/d), and Stokes number (St)—on the sampling process. For thin-walled probes, the present results are found to be in good agreement with reported experimental data, and with a semiempirical expression proposed by Belyaev and Levin. A least-squares curve-fitting method is used to determine a slightly more accurate correlation. Results for thick-walled probes are found to be in qualitative agreement with reported experimental findings: 1) even isokinetic sampling does not insure a representative sample; 2) probe thickness was found to play a minor role for superisokinetic sampling (Ʉ/U0 > 1); and 3) for subisokinetic sampling (Ʉ/U0 < 1), a thick-walled probe actually provides a sampling efficiency that is closer to unity than a thin-walled probe. © 1988 Elsevier Science Publishing Co., Inc.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Rader, D. J., & Marple, V. A. (1988). A study of the effects of anisokinetic sampling. Aerosol Science and Technology, 8(3), 283–299. https://doi.org/10.1080/02786828808959190

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free