Comparing an insurer's perspective on building damages with modelled damages from pan-European winter windstorm event sets: A case study from Zurich, Switzerland

16Citations
Citations of this article
23Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

With access to claims, insurers have a long tradition of being knowledge leaders on damages caused by windstorms. However, new opportunities have arisen to better assess the risks of winter windstorms in Europe through the availability of historic footprints provided by the Windstorm Information Service (Copernicus WISC). In this study, we compare how modelling of building damages complements claims-based risk assessment. We describe and use two windstorm risk models: an insurer's proprietary model and the open source CLIMADA platform. Both use the historic WISC dataset and a purposefully built, probabilistic hazard event set of winter windstorms across Europe to model building damages in the canton of Zurich, Switzerland. These approaches project a considerably lower estimate for the annual average damage (CHF 1.4 million), compared to claims (CHF 2.3 million), which originates mainly from a different assessment of the return period of the most damaging historic event Lothar-Martin. Additionally, the probabilistic modelling approach allows assessment of rare events, such as a 250-year-return-period windstorm causing CHF 75 million in damages, including an evaluation of the uncertainties. Our study emphasizes the importance of complementing a claims-based perspective with a probabilistic risk modelling approach to better understand windstorm risks. The presented open-source model provides a straightforward entry point for small insurance companies.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Welker, C., Röösli, T., & N. Bresch, D. (2021). Comparing an insurer’s perspective on building damages with modelled damages from pan-European winter windstorm event sets: A case study from Zurich, Switzerland. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences, 21(1), 279–299. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-21-279-2021

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free