Difference-in-Differences Designs: A Practitioner’s Guide

19Citations
Citations of this article
297Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Difference-in-differences (DiD) is arguably the most popular quasi-experimental research design. Its canonical form, with two groups and two periods, is well understood. However, empirical practices can be ad hoc when researchers go beyond that simple case. This article provides an organizing framework for discussing different types of DiD designs and their associated DiD estimators. It discusses covariates, weights, handling multiple periods, and staggered treatments. The organizational framework, however, applies to other extensions of DiD methods as well. (JEL C23, H75, I12, I38)

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Baker, A., Callaway, B., Cunningham, S., Goodman-Bacon, A., & Sant’Anna, P. H. C. (2026). Difference-in-Differences Designs: A Practitioner’s Guide. Journal of Economic Literature, 64(2), 498–557. https://doi.org/10.1257/jel.20251650

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free