The retroflection paradox

39Citations
Citations of this article
44Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

The classical question of what happens when a warm western boundary current, such as the North Brazil Current (NBC), retroflects is addressed analytically using a reduced-gravity nonlinear model. The traditional view is that the northwestward flowing current separates from the wall, turns to the right (looking offshore), and forms a zonal boundary current that flows eastward. Integration of the steady inviscid momentum equation along the boundary gives the longshore momentum flux (or flow force) and shows that such a scenario leads to a paradox. To resolve the paradox the separated current must constantly shed anticyclones, which propagate to the northwest due to β and an interaction with the boundary. This new eddy shedding mechanism, which is not related to the traditional instability of a zonal jet, may explain why the NBC must produce rings. A nonlinear analytical solution to the problem is constructed with the aid of a powerful theoretical approach based on the idea that nonlinear periodic flows can be integrated over a control volume. This method enables us to extract all the details of the resulting features without solving for the details of the incredibly complicated three-dimensional and time-dependent generation process. Due to the strong nonlinearity of the problem, the method is quite different from the familiar averaging technique that requires the existence of a "mean" current. To employ the above method, however, it was necessary to derive a new nonlinear formula for the β-induced migration of eddies adjacent to a zonal boundary that slopes in the N-S direction. It turns out that the general problem involves an eddy retroflection length scale Rd/ε1/6 (where Rd is the parent current Rossby radius and ε = βRd/f0) that is greater than that of most eddies (Rd). Calculations show that, for the retroflected NBC, which transports about 45 Sv, eddies are shed approximately once every 90 days.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Nof, D., & Pichevin, T. (1996). The retroflection paradox. Journal of Physical Oceanography, 26(11), 2344–2358. https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0485(1996)026<2344:TRP>2.0.CO;2

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free