Experimental methods for the analysis of the tensile behavior of concrete joints

3Citations
Citations of this article
6Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Adhesion plays an important role in the evaluation of hydraulic structures with unreinforced concrete joints. The experimental determination of joint tensile strength as a quantifiable parameter is not standardized, resulting in a variety of test setups found in literature. The present paper highlights advantages and disadvantages of three of the most common tension tests for plain concrete and concrete joints through both theoretical and laboratory experimental analysis on specimens with artificial joints. Splitting tension tests were found to be inexpensive but tend to overestimate the adhesive strength of weak joints. Direct tension tests require an elaborate test setup but may yield information on the tension softening behavior. Pull-off tests stand out for their ability to yield in-situ results but deliver inconclusive results.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Höffgen, J. P., Mohs, M., Sonderegger, E., Malárics-Pfaff, V., & Dehn, F. (2023). Experimental methods for the analysis of the tensile behavior of concrete joints. Structural Concrete, 24(1), 788–801. https://doi.org/10.1002/suco.202200181

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free