Campus Strategic Action in the Fisher Case: Organizational Stakeholder Advocacy Across the Field of Higher Education

7Citations
Citations of this article
38Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Your institution provides access to this article.

Abstract

Using a census sampling, this analysis evaluates the campus structures and practices that are predictive of a campus being affiliated with stakeholder legal advocacy regarding the Fisher Supreme Court affirmative action case of 2013. Findings reveal that a campus utilizing selective admissions operated as a sufficient, but not a necessary, requirement to prompt stakeholders to take a legal position in the case. Also, campuses that enrolled and graduated the largest percentages of nonwhite students were inclined to have stakeholders submit amicus briefs advocating support for UT-Austin and the use of race in selective college admissions.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Barnhardt, C. L., Young, R. L., Sheets, J. K. E., Phillips, C. W., Parker, E. T., & Reyes, K. (2017). Campus Strategic Action in the Fisher Case: Organizational Stakeholder Advocacy Across the Field of Higher Education. Research in Higher Education, 58(3), 313–339. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-016-9428-9

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free