Prognostics comparison of lithium-ion battery based on the shallow and deep neural networks model

40Citations
Citations of this article
24Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Prognostics of the remaining useful life (RUL) of lithium-ion batteries is a crucial role in the battery management systems (BMS). An artificial neural network (ANN) does not require much knowledge from the lithium-ion battery systems, thus it is a prospective data-driven prognostic method of lithium-ion batteries. Though the ANN has been applied in prognostics of lithium-ion batteries in some references, no one has compared the prognostics of the lithium-ion batteries based on different ANN. The ANN generally can be classified to two categories: the shallow ANN, such as the back propagation (BP) ANN and the nonlinear autoregressive (NAR) ANN, and the deep ANN, such as the long short-term memory (LSTM) NN. An improved LSTM NN is proposed in order to achieve higher prediction accuracy and make the construction of the model simpler. According to the lithium-ion data from the NASA Ames, the prognostics comparison of lithium-ion battery based on the BP ANN, the NAR ANN, and the LSTM ANN was studied in detail. The experimental results show: (1) The improved LSTM ANN has the best prognostic accuracy and is more suitable for the prediction of the RUL of lithium-ion batteries compared to the BP ANN and the NAR ANN; (2) the NAR ANN has better prognostic accuracy compared to the BP ANN.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Long, B., Li, X., Gao, X., & Liu, Z. (2019). Prognostics comparison of lithium-ion battery based on the shallow and deep neural networks model. Energies, 12(17). https://doi.org/10.3390/en12173271

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free