Abstract
Background: Cochrane Reviews are methodologically of high quality but the clinical relevance of analysed efficacy measures (EMs) should also be assessed. Methods: The clinical relevance of EMs used in one systematic Cochrane review of oral zolmitriptan for migraine headache was evaluated. Results: The following EMs were used: pain free at two hours (30%), headache relief at two hours (60%), sustained pain free for 24 hours (19%) and sustained headache relief for 24 hours (39%). These EMs were also used in four other Cochrane reviews of acute migraine treatment. Of these EMs sustained headache relief for 24 h is not judged clinically relevant. Conclusion: Pain free and sustained pain free are clinically relevant, but the responses are rather low, demonstrating that there is a need for improvement of acute drug treatment in migraine.
Author supplied keywords
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Tfelt-Hansen, P. (2015, April 16). What efficacy measures are clinically relevant and should be used in Cochrane Reviews of acute migraine trials? A viewpoint. Cephalalgia. SAGE Publications Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1177/0333102414545347
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.