What efficacy measures are clinically relevant and should be used in Cochrane Reviews of acute migraine trials? A viewpoint

3Citations
Citations of this article
26Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: Cochrane Reviews are methodologically of high quality but the clinical relevance of analysed efficacy measures (EMs) should also be assessed. Methods: The clinical relevance of EMs used in one systematic Cochrane review of oral zolmitriptan for migraine headache was evaluated. Results: The following EMs were used: pain free at two hours (30%), headache relief at two hours (60%), sustained pain free for 24 hours (19%) and sustained headache relief for 24 hours (39%). These EMs were also used in four other Cochrane reviews of acute migraine treatment. Of these EMs sustained headache relief for 24 h is not judged clinically relevant. Conclusion: Pain free and sustained pain free are clinically relevant, but the responses are rather low, demonstrating that there is a need for improvement of acute drug treatment in migraine.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Tfelt-Hansen, P. (2015, April 16). What efficacy measures are clinically relevant and should be used in Cochrane Reviews of acute migraine trials? A viewpoint. Cephalalgia. SAGE Publications Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1177/0333102414545347

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free