Impact of the ALMS and MAINTAIN trials on the management of lupus nephritis

32Citations
Citations of this article
66Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Current treatment of lupus nephritis consists of both induction and maintenance therapy, with the latter being designed to consolidate remissions and prevent relapses. Long-term maintenance treatment with intravenous cyclophosphamide was effective but associated with considerable toxicity. A small but well-designed controlled trial found that for post-induction maintenance therapy, both oral mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) and oral azathioprine were superior in efficacy and had reduced toxicity than a regimen of continued every third month intravenous cyclophosphamide. Although these oral agents were rapidly accepted and utilized as maintenance medications, their usage was based on scant evidence and there were no comparisons between the two. Recently, two relatively large, randomized, well-controlled, multicenter trials dealing with maintenance therapy for severe lupus nephritis have been completed. The Aspreva Lupus Management Study (ALMS) maintenance and MAINTAIN nephritis trials provide important information regarding the comparative efficacy and safety of MMF and azathioprine as maintenance therapies, as well as information on the effect of dosage and duration of treatment with these agents. © 2012 The Authors.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Morris, H. K., Canetta, P. A., & Appel, G. B. (2013, June). Impact of the ALMS and MAINTAIN trials on the management of lupus nephritis. Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation. https://doi.org/10.1093/ndt/gfs447

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free