The errors of Karen Franklin's pretextuality

7Citations
Citations of this article
29Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

In her recent article, Hebephilia: Quintessence of Diagnostic Pretextuality (published in Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 2010), Karen Franklin expands on her previous argument that psychologists and psychiatrists should not diagnose as abnormal hebephilia, the sexual preference for early pubescent children. She supports her argument with a series of claims about the contents of the empirical literature and the scientists who produced it. The present document provides fact-checking of those claims, revealing that Franklin's conclusions are based largely on demonstrable falsehoods. © 2012 Copyright Taylor and Francis Group, LLC.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Cantor, J. M. (2012). The errors of Karen Franklin’s pretextuality. International Journal of Forensic Mental Health, 11(1), 59–62. https://doi.org/10.1080/14999013.2012.672945

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free