Predictors of recovery of ovarian function during aromatase inhibitor therapy

41Citations
Citations of this article
52Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: Aromatase inhibitors (AIs) may cause a rise in estrogen levels due to ovarian function recovery in women with clinical chemotherapy-induced ovarian failure (CIOF). We carried out a prospective registry trial to identify predictors of ovarian function recovery during AI therapy. Patients and methods: Women with hormone receptor (HR)-positive breast cancer who remained amenorrheic and had hormonal levels consistent with ovarian failure after adjuvant chemotherapy were enrolled in a multi-institutional clinical trial of anastrozole. Subjects underwent frequent assessment using an ultrasensitive estradiol assay. Multivariable analysis was used to evaluate clinical and biochemical predictors of ovarian function recovery within 48 weeks. Results: Recovery of ovarian function during AI therapy was observed in 13 of 45 (28.9%) assessable subjects after a median 2.1 months (range 0.6-11.9). Median age at chemotherapy initiation was statistically significantly different between those who regained ovarian function (43 years, range 40-51) and those who remained postmenopausal (49 years, range 44-52; P < 0.0001). Conclusions: A significant proportion of women with CIOF recover ovarian function during AI therapy, including a woman over age 50 at initiation of chemotherapy. Tamoxifen remains the standard of care for women with CIOF. If an AI is used, patients should be monitored frequently with high-quality estradiol assays.Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT00555477. © The Author 2013. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society for Medical Oncology. All rights reserved.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Henry, N. L., Xia, R., Banerjee, M., Gersch, C., McConnell, D., Giacherio, D., … Hayes, D. F. (2013). Predictors of recovery of ovarian function during aromatase inhibitor therapy. Annals of Oncology, 24(8), 2011–2016. https://doi.org/10.1093/annonc/mdt149

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free