Differences in self-regulated learning strategies among industrial design students: A convergent mixed-methods study

1Citations
Citations of this article
32Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The value of self-regulated learning skills for academic achievement has been shown in different domains. However, self-regulated learning skills in design studio education have rarely been studied directly. This study aimed to explore differences in self-regulated learning strategies and motivational factors between high and low achieving industrial design students in an industrial design studio course. We applied a convergent mixed methods design with self-report questionnaires and interviews to gain a comprehensive understanding of students’ strategy use. The integrated analysis of quantitative data from 47 students and qualitative data from 16 students demonstrated differences between high and low achieving design students’ self-regulated learning skills concerning the use of metacognitive, motivational and behavioral strategies. Together with the expanded integration of data analysis, these findings indicate that self-regulated learning examinations should be undertaken with caution in design studio contexts.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Ates Akdeniz, A., & Turan, G. (2022). Differences in self-regulated learning strategies among industrial design students: A convergent mixed-methods study. A/Z ITU Journal of the Faculty of Architecture, 19(2), 277–299. https://doi.org/10.5505/itujfa.2022.44522

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free