Vigilância e segurança pública: preconceitos e segregação social ampliados pela suposta neutralidade digital (Surveillance and public security: prejudices and social segregation widened by the alleged digital neutrality)

  • MIRANDA P
  • et al.
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
5Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

This article attends to demonstrate how the new algorithmic implementations, allegedly unbiased, accentuate discrimination and prejudice through the surveillance mechanisms. When personal information about the population is applied to the development of artificial intelligence technologies, in a society already marked by selectivity, the consequences can be catastrophic. The starting point is given by the analysis on surveillance, updated by Zygmunt Bauman, describing how the information society was shaped and gained the form it has today. Then, through a bibliographic review based on a deductive method, it is possible to observe that in countries where there is a permanent feeling of insecurity and racial discrimination has become institutionalized, the lack of transparent use of predictive algorithms, especially by criminal justice, causes negative effects on effectiveness of public policies, making more and more victims and accentuating disparities, instead of promoting security.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

MIRANDA, P. F. M., & SCHNEIDER, C. B. (2020). Vigilância e segurança pública: preconceitos e segregação social ampliados pela suposta neutralidade digital (Surveillance and public security: prejudices and social segregation widened by the alleged digital neutrality). Emancipacao, 20, 1–22. https://doi.org/10.5212/emancipacao.v.20.2014258.022

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free