Abstract
Background and Purpose—: No evidence is available on the benefits of preventive suboccipital decompressive craniectomy (SDC) for patients with cerebellar infarction. The purpose of this matched case–control study was to investigate whether preventive SDC was associated with good clinical outcomes in patients with cerebellar infarction and to evaluate its predisposing factors. Methods—: Between March 2007 and September 2015, 28 patients underwent preventive SDC. We performed propensity score matching to establish a proper control group among 721 patients with cerebellar infarction during the same period. Group A (n=28) consists of those who underwent preventive SDC, and group B (n=56) consists of those who did not undergo preventive SDC. We analyzed and compared clinical outcomes between groups. Results—: Clinical outcomes were better in group A than in group B at discharge ( Conclusions—: Favorable clinical outcomes including overall survival can be expected after preventive SDC in patients with a volume ratio between 0.25 and 0.33 and the absence of brain stem infarction. Among these patients, preventive SDC might be better than the best medical treatment alone.
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Kim, M. J., Park, S. K., Song, J., Oh, S., Lim, Y. C., Sim, S. Y., … Chung, J. (2016). Preventive Suboccipital Decompressive Craniectomy for Cerebellar Infarction. Stroke, 47(10), 2565–2573. https://doi.org/10.1161/strokeaha.116.014078
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.