The efficacy of L-carnitine in improving malnutrition in patients on maintenance hemodialysis: A meta-analysis

9Citations
Citations of this article
42Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The improvement of malnutrition with levocarnitine in maintenance hemodialysis (MHD) patients is controversial. We performed ameta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy of levocarnitine in improving malnutrition in MHD patients. We performed a literature search for relevant articles related to the treatment of malnutrition by L-carnitine in MHD patients in PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, and Wanfang databases. We set the publication dates from 1950 to July 2019. The levels of albumin, prealbumin, total protein, and transferrin before and after treatment were used for assessing malnutrition. Twenty-seven studies were included in the present analysis. The results of the random effects model indicated that L-carnitine treatment improved the albumin level in patients on MHD patients. The pooled standardized mean difference of albumin level was 2.51 (95% confidence interval (CI): 2.13-2.90, P<0.001). The pooled total protein level was 3.83 (95% CI: 2.41-5.24, P = 0.000) and the pooled transferrin level was 0.35 (95% CI: 0.18-0.52, P = 0.000). Significant differences were observed with the total protein and transferrin levels. The results indicated that levocarnitine significantly improved the prealbumin level in patients on MHD. The pooled prealbumin level was 70.86 (95% CI: 42.99-98.73, P = 0.000). No publication bias was detected (P>0.05). The present meta-analysis indicated that L-carnitine can have a favorable effect on malnutrition biomarkers in patients on MHD, including the increase in albumin, total protein, transferrin, and prealbumin levels. The L-carnitine could be an option for treatment of MHD patients.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Zhou, J., & Yang, T. (2020). The efficacy of L-carnitine in improving malnutrition in patients on maintenance hemodialysis: A meta-analysis. Bioscience Reports, 40(6). https://doi.org/10.1042/BSR20201639

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free