Framing male circumcision to promote its adoption in different settings

13Citations
Citations of this article
32Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

The effectiveness of male circumcision in preventing transmission of HIV from females to males has been established. Those who are now advocating its widespread use face many challenges in convincing policymakers and the public of circumcision's value. We suggest that frames are a useful lens for communicating public health messages that may help promote adoption of circumcision. Frames relate to how individuals and societies perceive and understand the world. Existing frames are often hard to shift, and should be borne in mind by advocates and program implementers as they attempt to promote male circumcision by invoking new frames. Frames differ across and within societies, and advocates must find ways of delivering resonant messages that take into account prior perceptions and use the most appropriate means of communicating the benefits and value of male circumcision to different audiences.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Gilliam, F. D., Brooks, R. A., Leibowitz, A. A., Klosinski, L. E., Sawires, S., Szekeres, G., … Coates, T. J. (2010). Framing male circumcision to promote its adoption in different settings. AIDS and Behavior, 14(5), 1207–1211. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10461-009-9656-5

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free