Abstract
Background: To examine the relationship between civic association participation and psychological distress during the COVID-19 pandemic, particularly whether different forms of engagement mitigate the increased rates of psychological distress throughout 2020. Methods: Panel survey data collected from a nationally representative cohort of 1222 U.S. adults. Data was collected in three waves in April, July, and November 2020. Psychological distress was measured using the validated Kessler-6 instrument in November 2020. Results: Respondents belonging to political associations were more likely to experience psychological distress (difference in predicted level of psychological distress on a 0-1 scale: 0.098, p ≤.05) relative to those in unknown associations. However, individuals in political associations who more frequently interacted with others had lower levels of psychological distress (−.065, p ≤.05) compared to those in political associations with less frequent interactions. Conclusions: Civic engagement that facilitates interpersonal interactions may protect against psychological distress.
Author supplied keywords
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Topazian, R. J., Levine, A. S., McGinty, E. E., Barry, C. L., & Han, H. (2022). Civic engagement and psychological distress during the COVID-19 pandemic. BMC Public Health, 22(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-022-13289-4
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.