Civic engagement and psychological distress during the COVID-19 pandemic

11Citations
Citations of this article
19Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: To examine the relationship between civic association participation and psychological distress during the COVID-19 pandemic, particularly whether different forms of engagement mitigate the increased rates of psychological distress throughout 2020. Methods: Panel survey data collected from a nationally representative cohort of 1222 U.S. adults. Data was collected in three waves in April, July, and November 2020. Psychological distress was measured using the validated Kessler-6 instrument in November 2020. Results: Respondents belonging to political associations were more likely to experience psychological distress (difference in predicted level of psychological distress on a 0-1 scale: 0.098, p ≤.05) relative to those in unknown associations. However, individuals in political associations who more frequently interacted with others had lower levels of psychological distress (−.065, p ≤.05) compared to those in political associations with less frequent interactions. Conclusions: Civic engagement that facilitates interpersonal interactions may protect against psychological distress.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Topazian, R. J., Levine, A. S., McGinty, E. E., Barry, C. L., & Han, H. (2022). Civic engagement and psychological distress during the COVID-19 pandemic. BMC Public Health, 22(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-022-13289-4

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free