Abstract
Objective eHealth is a useful tool to deliver lifestyle interventions for patients with cardiometabolic diseases. However, there are inconsistent findings about whether these eHealth interventions should be supported by a human professional, or whether self-help interventions are equally effective. Methods Databases were searched between January 1995 and October 2021 for randomized controlled trials on cardiometabolic diseases (cardiovascular disease, chronic kidney disease, type 1 and 2 diabetes mellitus) and eHealth lifestyle interventions. A multilevel meta-analysis was used to pool clinical and behavioral health outcomes. Moderator analyses assessed the effect of intervention type (self-help versus human-supported), dose of human support (minor versus major part of intervention), and delivery mode of human support (remote versus blended). One hundred seven articles fulfilled eligibility criteria and 102 unique (N = 20,781) studies were included. Results The analysis showed a positive effect of eHealth lifestyle interventions on clinical and behavioral health outcomes (p
Author supplied keywords
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Cohen Rodrigues, T. R., Breeman, L. D., Kinik, A., Reijnders, T., Dusseldorp, E., Janssen, V. R., … Evers, A. W. M. (2023). Effectiveness of Human-Supported and Self-Help eHealth Lifestyle Interventions for Patients with Cardiometabolic Risk Factors: A Meta-Analysis. Psychosomatic Medicine, 85(9), 795–804. https://doi.org/10.1097/PSY.0000000000001242
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.