Secular evolution and A non-evolving black-hole-to-galaxy mass ratio in the last 7Gyr

118Citations
Citations of this article
37Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

We present new constraints on the ratio of black hole (BH) mass to total galaxy stellar mass at 0.3 < z < 0.9 for a sample of 32 type-1 active galactic nuclei (AGNs) from the XMM-COSMOS survey covering the range M BH 107.2 - 8.7 M⊙. Virial M BH estimates based on Hβ are available from the COSMOS Magellan/IMACS survey. We use high-resolution Hubble Space Telescope (HST) imaging to decompose the light of each type-1 AGN and host galaxy, and employ a specially built mass-to-light ratio to estimate the stellar masses (M *). The M BH-M * ratio shows a zero offset with respect to the local relation for galactic bulge masses, and we also find no evolution in the mass ratio M BH/M *(1 + z)0.02 0.34 up to z 0.9. Interestingly, at the high-M BH end there is a positive offset from the z = 0 relation, which can be fully explained by a mass function bias with a cosmic scatter of σμ = 0.3, reaffirming that the intrinsic distribution is consistent with zero evolution. From our results we conclude that since z 0.9 no substantial addition of stellar mass is required: the decline in star formation rates and merger activity at z < 1 support this scenario. Nevertheless, given that a significant fraction of these galaxies show a disk component, their bulges are indeed undermassive. This is a direct indication that for the last 7Gyr the only essential mechanism required for these galaxies to obey the z = 0 relation is a redistribution of stellar mass to the bulge, likely driven by secular processes, i.e., internal instabilities and minor merging. © 2011. The American Astronomical Society. All rights reserved.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Cisternas, M., Jahnke, K., Bongiorno, A., Inskip, K. J., Impey, C. D., Koekemoer, A. M., … Trump, J. R. (2011). Secular evolution and A non-evolving black-hole-to-galaxy mass ratio in the last 7Gyr. Astrophysical Journal Letters, 741(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/2041-8205/741/1/L11

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free