Intermittent Fasting versus Continuous Calorie Restriction: Which Is Better for Weight Loss?

41Citations
Citations of this article
187Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials and pilot trial studies to compare the effectiveness of intermittent fasting (IF) and continuous calorie restriction (CCR) in overweight and obese people. The parameters included body mass index (BMI), body weight, and other metabolism-related indicators. A systematic search in PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science was conducted up to January 2022. Standardized mean differences (SMDs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were used to measure the effectiveness. Publication bias was assessed using Egger’s test. The stability of the results was evaluated using sensitivity analyses. The significance of body weight change (SMD = −0.21, 95% CI (−0.40, −0.02) p = 0.028) was more significant after IF than CCR. There was no significant difference in BMI (SMD = 0.02, 95% CI (−0.16, 0.20) p = 0.848) between IF and CCR. These findings suggest that IF may be superior to CCR for weight loss in some respects.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Zhang, Q., Zhang, C., Wang, H., Ma, Z., Liu, D., Guan, X., … Dong, J. (2022). Intermittent Fasting versus Continuous Calorie Restriction: Which Is Better for Weight Loss? Nutrients, 14(9). https://doi.org/10.3390/nu14091781

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free