Randomised study using IFN-a versus IFN-a plus coumarin and cimetidine for treatment of advanced renal cell cancer

44Citations
Citations of this article
11Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: Treatment results in patients with metastatic renal cell cancer (RCC) are still extremely unsatisfactory. Rates of response to IFN-a monotherapy and/or IL-2 mono/combination therapy vary between 10% and 20%. Coumarin (Cum) together with cimetidine (Cim) has yielded objective responses in 20%-33% of patients with RCC, according to two recent phase II studies. Patients and methods: In the present study 148 patients with metastatic RCC were randomised to receive either IFN-a (5 MU 5 × weekly s.c.) + coumarin (100 mg/d p.o.) + cimetidine (3 × 400 mg/d p.o.), or IFN-a-monotherapy (5 MU 5 × weekly s.c). Results: Of the 148 patients in the study 137 were evalu-able for response. No differences in remission rates (RR IFN-a + Cum + Cim 17.1% and IFN-a 20.8%) or survival times (median survival 9 months and 8 months, respectively) were found between these two treatment arms. Conclusions: This study confirms that IFN-a has anti-tumoral activity in RCC. Adding coumarin + cimetidine to IFN-a in the dose and regimen prescribed in this study did not increase response rates or survival. © 1995 Kluwer Academic Publishers.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Sagaster, P., Micksche, M., Flamm, J., & Ludwig, H. (1995). Randomised study using IFN-a versus IFN-a plus coumarin and cimetidine for treatment of advanced renal cell cancer. Annals of Oncology, 6(10), 999–1004. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.annonc.a059097

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free