The community health systems reform cycle: Strengthening the integration of community health worker programs through an institutional reform perspective

8Citations
Citations of this article
83Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

To develop guidance for governments and partners seeking to scale community health worker programs, we developed a conceptual framework, collected observations from the scale-up efforts of 7 countries, workshopped the framework with technical groups and with country stakeholders, and reviewed literature in the areas of health and policy reform, change management, institutional development, health systems, and advocacy. We observed that successful scale-up is a complex process of institutional reform. Successful scale-up: (1) depends on a carefully choreographed, problem-driven political process; (2) requires that scaled program models are drawn from solutions that are available in a given health system context and aligned with the resources, capabilities, and commitments of key health sector stakeholders; and (3) emerges from iterative cycles of learning and improvement, rather than a single, linear scale-up effort. We identify stages of the reform process associated with each of these 3 findings: Problem prioritization, coalition building, solution gathering, design, program readiness, launch, governance, and management and learning. The resulting Community Health Systems Reform Cycle can be used by government, donors, and nongovernmental partners to prioritize and design community health worker scale-up efforts, diagnose challenges or gaps in successful scale-up and integration, and coordinate the contributions of diverse stakeholders.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Chen, N., Raghavan, M., Albert, J., McDaniel, A., Otiso, L., Kintu, R., … Jacobsteine, D. (2021, March 1). The community health systems reform cycle: Strengthening the integration of community health worker programs through an institutional reform perspective. Global Health Science and Practice. Johns Hopkins University Press. https://doi.org/10.9745/GHSP-D-20-00429

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free