Abstract
ABSTRACT Objective: This study evaluated the marginal and internal fit of pressable versus machinable polyetheretherketone (PEEK) and versus zirconia copings. Material and Methods: Twenty one copings of lower molar were used in this study, which were divided according to type of material used and method of manufacturing into three main groups: seven specimens each, zirconia (Zr), PEEK CAD (PC) and PEEK press (Pp) groups. Copings were subjected to three dimension (3D) analysis of marginal and internal fit by using a triple scan protocol. Results: The results of this study showed that zirconia group recorded statistically significant P=0.02 (P<0.05) lower absolute marginal gap mean value (60 ±10 µm) than PEEK CAD (69 ± 0.00µm) and PEEK press group (69 ± 10µm). Among internal fit There was no statistical significant difference between the three groups as p =0.36 (> 0.05) but PEEK press showed better internal fit. (126±30 µm), (130±40 µm) and (112±40 µm) for zirconia, PEEK CAD and PEEK press respectively. Conclusion: Marginal and internal fit for the three groups were within the acceptance range while zirconia copings show significance superior marginal fit than PEEK groups.
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Makky, M., Shokry, T., & Metwally, M. (2020). Comparison of Marginal and Internal Fit of Copings Fabricated from Polyetheretherketone and Zirconia: An in-vitro study. Al-Azhar Journal of Dental Science, 23(4), 355–362. https://doi.org/10.21608/ajdsm.2020.26019.1035
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.