La admisión jurisprudencial del voto por internet para los residentes en el extranjero de la ciudad de México

0Citations
Citations of this article
16Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The text analyzes the Mexican court judgments around electronic voting and compares the criteria supported by the German Constitutional Court. It is argued that e-voting for abroad residents has a strong argument in the principle of universal suffrage that can justify some of its negative impact on citizens’ rights, specifically justifies the lack of direct citizen oversight of the electoral process, when you vote by Internet. However it is argued that this argument does not justify the complete substitution of the vote in person for people living in Mexico City. The issue discussed is important, because in the particular case, e-voting was a creation of the electoral authorities that was binding, but they lacked a specific basis in law. This peculiarity allows us to say that e-voting in Mexico has been admitted by jurisprudence, before legally or congressionally. The text also discusses some of the features of Internet voting for the City of Mexico, as the inability to cast a blank vote.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Sandoval Ballesteros, N. (2015). La admisión jurisprudencial del voto por internet para los residentes en el extranjero de la ciudad de México. Boletin Mexicano de Derecho Comparado, (142), 275–312. https://doi.org/10.22201/iij.24484873e.2015.142.4921

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free