An experimental evaluation of StatHand: A free application to guide students’ statistical decision making.

7Citations
Citations of this article
29Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Quantitative research methods underpin psychological literacy and evidence-based practice in psychology. Despite this, many students struggle to identify appropriate statistics for different types of research questions and data types. StatHand (see https://stathand.net) is a free application that facilitates this statistical decision making process by prompting students to focus systematically on each structural characteristic of their research design. A total of 217 undergraduate psychology students were randomized to use one of four decision making aids: StatHand on an iPad, a familiar textbook, a familiar paper decision tree, or the textbook and decision tree combined. Participants were then asked to identify suitable statistics for five research scenarios. Students assigned to use StatHand demonstrated higher decision making accuracy than users of the three alternative aids (δ = .50 to .64). StatHand users also experienced lower cognitive load, higher confidence in the accuracy of their decisions and greater satisfaction with their assigned aid than one or more of the other groups. However, it took the StatHand users longer to make their decisions. Finally, there was strong evidence to support the hypothesis that StatHand is instructionally efficient, and that its use requires less effort to promote higher performance relative to the other three aids (δ = .49 to .70). StatHand can be incorporated into a variety of classroom learning activities, and educators are encouraged to consider how they can use it most effectively. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved)

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Allen, P. J., Finlay, J., Roberts, L. D., & Baughman, F. D. (2019). An experimental evaluation of StatHand: A free application to guide students’ statistical decision making. Scholarship of Teaching and Learning in Psychology, 5(1), 23–36. https://doi.org/10.1037/stl0000132

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free