Effect of Muscle Energy Technique versus Graston Technique on nonspecific neck pain

0Citations
Citations of this article
17Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background: Numerous researches have been carried out in order to determine the most effective physical therapy strategy for treating nonspecific neck pain (NSNP). Purpose: To contrast between the outcomes of Graston Technique (GT) and Muscle Energy Technique (MET) on both pain intensity and functional disability in patients with NSNP. Methods: Forty-two (30 males and 12 females) patients with NSNP divided randomly into three groups: Group A: received Graston Technique and traditional physiotherapy treatment (TPT), Group B: received muscle energy technique and TPT, and Group C: received TPT only. Intervention lasted for 12 sessions (3 per week). At the start and finish of the fourth week, a visual analogue scale was used to quantify pain intensity and a neck disability index (NDI) questionnaire was used to measure functional disability. Results: There were significant mean effects of time (pre/post) and intervention group (Graston, MET, conventional) and significant interaction on pain and disability (p<0.05). MET group had higher changes in the pain than both Graston and control groups (p<0.05). However, no significant differences among groups in the functional change. Conclusion: GT and MET had similar effects on the function in patients with NSNP, but MET had higher effects on reducing pain.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Elsayed, M., Mohamed, M. A., Ali, M. F., Dabash, G. R., El Din Taha, T. S., & Abdelrahim, R. M. (2023). Effect of Muscle Energy Technique versus Graston Technique on nonspecific neck pain. Sport TK, 12. https://doi.org/10.6018/sportk.599011

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free