Learners’ Perceptions of Synchronous Written Corrective Feedback in Videoconferenced Collaborative Writing

2Citations
Citations of this article
15Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Second language (L2) research suggests that synchronous written corrective feedback (SWCF) in online collaborative writing tasks can help improve L2 linguistic knowledge and writing skills. Following the rise of online collaborative writing in the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic, this exploratory study examines L2 learners’ perceptions of receiving SWCF during collaborative writing tasks completed on an online text-editing platform (Google Docs) and mediated by videoconferencing (Zoom). Adult learners (N = 46) enrolled in advanced online French as a Second Language courses took part in two collaborative writing tasks, during which their teachers (N = 3) provided SWCF. Learners’ screen activity was recorded. After the experiment, a perception survey was distributed and selected participants took part in semi-structured interviews to further discuss their experience. Results indicate that learners viewed the provision of SWCF through computer-mediated communication as an effective way to improve their L2 writing compared to traditional, delayed written feedback. Pedagogical implications for the implementation of videoconferenced collaborative writing tasks involving teacher SWCF are discussed.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Papin, K., & Michaud, G. (2023). Learners’ Perceptions of Synchronous Written Corrective Feedback in Videoconferenced Collaborative Writing. Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology, 49(3). https://doi.org/10.21432/cjlt28511

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free