Hope is Not a Strategy: Using Robust Real-World Evidence to Make Better Clinical Development Decisions

2Citations
Citations of this article
4Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Clinical development delays and failures do not serve public health. Reliance solely on expert opinion or historical patterns rather than evidence from representative, real-world point-of-care data about the indication results in suboptimal trial design, missed opportunities, and uninterpretable findings. Investment in real-world evidence (RWE) generation to build a deep, comprehensive, and current understanding of the characteristics, care, and outcomes of the indicated population is essential to improving clinical development decision making. Despite the recognized value of RWE, this evidence generation is not done systematically. Here we make integrated RWE generation more compelling and practicable by addressing concerns we have heard from biopharma leaders and, for emerging RWE leaders, providing a blueprint for designing real-world studies in a phased approach that aligns with clinical development investment. Our work is intended to facilitate more widespread adoption of integrated RWE generation, beginning early in development, so that robust RWE is in hand at the right time for evidence-based decision making by the sponsor, regulators, and payers.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Gatto, N. M., & Campbell, U. B. (2025, November 1). Hope is Not a Strategy: Using Robust Real-World Evidence to Make Better Clinical Development Decisions. Therapeutic Innovation and Regulatory Science. Springer Science and Business Media Deutschland GmbH. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43441-025-00822-x

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free