Comparison of Traditional Didactic Versus Additional Hands-On Simulation Training in the Performance of Basic Life Support in Veterinary Students—A Prospective, Blinded, Randomized Study

2Citations
Citations of this article
26Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) is a critical skill for veterinarians, but the most effective training methods and techniques are still unknown. In human medicine, simulation training enhances both knowledge and performance of basic life support CPR. This study evaluated the comparative effectiveness of didactic versus a combination of didactic and simulation training on performance and understanding of basic life support techniques in second-year veterinary medical students.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Walton, R., Riha, J., Swor, T., Kopper, J., Yuan, L., Mochel, J., … Blong, A. (2024). Comparison of Traditional Didactic Versus Additional Hands-On Simulation Training in the Performance of Basic Life Support in Veterinary Students—A Prospective, Blinded, Randomized Study. Journal of Veterinary Medical Education, 51(1), 38–43. https://doi.org/10.3138/jvme-2022-0121

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free