ARCHITECTURE AS IDENTIFICATION OF PLACE : THE CASE OF JOGLO KAMPUNG KETANDAN SURABAYA

  • Mappajaya A
  • Nuffida N
  • Rachmawati M
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
10Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

To make a site become a place is the existential function of architecture. The definition of architecture as identification of place (Unwin, 2003), comes with a purpose that architecture is also a process to discover the essence, the meaning conceivably present in the given environment. In the case of Kampung Ketandan Surabaya, the architecture is produced by the community by preserving and revitalizing the character of the kampung, with regards to its history, its activities and its buildings. Balai Pertemuan Warga in the form of Pendhopo is one of many other community centers in the kampung. This paper investigates in what way architecture generates symbolic places. Descriptive criticism is used as a method to investigate the phenomenon by considering architecture as a way of art and finding the interrelationship between the elements in it. To grasp the context of Kampung Ketandan, a case study method is chosen because of its ability to explore and endow the holistic, yet meaningful aspects of a presence phenomenon happening in real-life. The results of the study revealed that place is a holistic phenomenon, determining an 'environmental character' and architecture is a symbol to identify it.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Mappajaya, A., Nuffida, N. E., & Rachmawati, M. (2019). ARCHITECTURE AS IDENTIFICATION OF PLACE : THE CASE OF JOGLO KAMPUNG KETANDAN SURABAYA. Journal of Architecture&ENVIRONMENT, 18(2), 115. https://doi.org/10.12962/j2355262x.v18i2.a5862

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free