Securitizing mobility: Profiling ‘non-core’ Europeans

9Citations
Citations of this article
11Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

By combining securitization literature and literature from the field of border criminologies, this article reflects upon the ongoing securitization of intra-EU East–West mobility. The European Union is built on the inherent tension between the (economic) benefits and risks of one of its core principles: the principle of free movement. The two enlargements of the EU that led to the inclusion of several countries located in Central and Eastern Europe further increased this tension and led countries in Western Europe to officially reconstruct intra-Schengen borders. By looking into recent practices of (border) policing in the Netherlands, this article illustrates how CEE nationals are subjected not only to a securitized discourse around their mobility but also to securitized policing practices that aim to create a division between ‘core’ and ‘non-core’ Europeans while at the same time distinguishing between possible ‘crimmigrant’ others and bona fide travellers.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

van der Woude, M. (2023). Securitizing mobility: Profiling ‘non-core’ Europeans. Security Dialogue, 54(6), 620–638. https://doi.org/10.1177/09670106221125041

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free