Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor and granulocyte-macrophage colony- stimulating factor: Comparisons and potential for use in the treatment of infections in nonneutropenic patients

142Citations
Citations of this article
132Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) and granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) enhance the antimicrobial functions of mature neutrophils. G-CSF differs from GM-CSF in its specificity of action on developing and mature neutrophils, its effects on neutrophil kinetics, and its toxicity profile. The toxicity profile of recombinant (r) GM-CSF is consistent with priming of macrophages for increased formation and release of inflammatory cytokines, whereas rG-CSF induces production of antiinflammatory factors, such as interleukin-1 receptor antagonist and soluble tumor necrosis factor receptors, and is protective against endotoxin- and sepsis-induced organ injury. The low toxicity of rG-CSF, results of animal models of infection, and extensive experience with neutropenic subjects have promoted clinical studies in nonneutropenic subjects, which indicate that rG-CSF may be beneficial as adjunctive therapy for treatment of serious bacterial and opportunistic fungal infections in nonneutropenic patients, including those with alterations in neutrophil function.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Root, R. K., & Dale, D. C. (1999). Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor and granulocyte-macrophage colony- stimulating factor: Comparisons and potential for use in the treatment of infections in nonneutropenic patients. In Journal of Infectious Diseases (Vol. 179). University of Chicago Press. https://doi.org/10.1086/513857

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free