Preferred compression threshold and release time in quiet and noisy conditions for elderly korean hearing aid users

4Citations
Citations of this article
10Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background and Objectives: Listeners with sensorineural hearing loss want to compensate for their narrow dynamic range from appropriate compression functions of hearing aids. The present study aimed to determine which compression threshold and release time of nonlinear hearing aids might affect speech recognition and speech quality judgments. Subjects and Methods: Ten elderly listeners with symmetrical moderate-to-severe sensorineural hearing loss participated in the study. To compare two compression threshold (31 dB SPL vs. 61 dB SPL) and two release time (50 ms vs. 500 ms) conditions, subjects' speech recognition was measured using the Korean version of the Hearing in Noise Test in both quiet and noisy situations. All subjects were also asked to rate the degree of speech quality in terms of loudness, sharpness, clarity, and background noise immediately after completing the speech recognition test. Results: Although no significant difference emerged in speech recognition thresholds between the two compression thresholds in the quiet situation, the compression threshold of 31 dB SPL showed a lower (or better) signal-to-noise ratio of speech recognition compared to that of 61 dB SPL. The release times of 50 and 500 ms did not statistically differ in both quiet and noisy situations. Subjective categories were found to be louder and clearer in the 50 ms release time for quiet and noisy, respectively. Conclusions: We expect that these patterns of current results will apply for better-fitting protocol of elderly Korean hearing aid users.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Han, W., Lee, J., Kim, J., Lee, K., & Kim, D. (2017). Preferred compression threshold and release time in quiet and noisy conditions for elderly korean hearing aid users. Journal of Audiology and Otology, 21(3), 133–139. https://doi.org/10.7874/jao.2017.00066

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free