Frameworks for developing impactful systematic literature reviews and theory building: What, Why and How?

329Citations
Citations of this article
954Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

With the increased momentum of knowledge generation in the field of research, systematic reviews are essential to epitomise the state of extant literature and for theory building. In this article, we discuss the advantages of synthesising and reporting findings using a more impactful type of systematic review, the framework-based review. Additionally, we list and summarise some of the popularly used frameworks, TCCM (theories-contexts-characteristics-methods; Paul & Rosado-Serrano, 2019), ADO (antecedents-decisions-outcomes; Paul & Benito, 2018), 5W+ H (who, when, where, what, why, how; Callahan, 2014) and IMO (input-mediators-outcomes; Ilgen et al., 2005). We also provide methodological guidelines for conducting such a review.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Paul, J., Khatri, P., & Kaur Duggal, H. (2024). Frameworks for developing impactful systematic literature reviews and theory building: What, Why and How? Journal of Decision Systems, 33(4), 537–550. https://doi.org/10.1080/12460125.2023.2197700

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free