The value of glioma extent of resection in the modern neurosurgical era

83Citations
Citations of this article
88Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Objective: There remains no general consensus in the neurosurgical oncology literature regarding the role of extent of glioma resection in improving patient outcome. Although the value of resection in establishing a diagnosis and alleviating mass effect is clear, there is less certainty in ascertaining the influence of extent of resection (EOR). Here, we review the recent literature to synthesize a comprehensive review of the value of extent of resection for gliomas in the modern neurosurgical era. Methods: We reviewed every major peerreviewed clinical publication since 1990 on the role of EOR in glioma outcome. Results: Thirty-two high-grade glioma articles and 11 low-grade glioma articles were examined in terms of quality of evidence, expected EOR, and survival benefit. Conclusion: Despite limitations in the quality of data, mounting evidence suggests that more extensive surgical resection is associated with longer life expectancy for both low- and high-grade newly diagnosed gliomas.© 2012 Hardesty and Sanai.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Hardesty, D. A., & Sanai, N. (2012). The value of glioma extent of resection in the modern neurosurgical era. Frontiers in Neurology, OCT. https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2012.00140

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free