Eficacia diagnóstica de la ecografía y la histeroscopia en pacientes con patología endometrial

0Citations
Citations of this article
10Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Objective: To determine the diagnostic efficacy of ultrasound and hysteroscopy in patients with endometrial pathology who attended the gynecological service of the Hospital Universitario “Dr. Pedro Emilio Carrillo” January 2017- July 2017. Method: A correlational, quasi-experimental and prospective study was conducted, including 33 patients with endometrial pathology who had transvaginal ultrasound, hysteroscopy and sampling for histological study. Results: The average age of patients was 50±0.23 years (33 - 72 years), the average age of menarquia was 11.84 years; obstetric history had the following means: gestations: 2.27±2,15; 1.72±2.12; abortions: 0.09±0.38; C-section: 0.45±0.97. The menstrual cycle was irregular in 54.5%; 81.8% reported dysmenorrhea and 63.6% used oral contraceptives. Most of the patients reported having pelvic pain and a family history as a risk factor. The most frequent ultrasound diagnosis was endometrial thickening. The most common hysteroscopic diagnosis was submucosous myoma (36.4%). Transvaginal ultrasound for the diagnosis of submucosal fibroids has 100% specificity and sensitivity; hysteroscopy has 96% specificity for endometrial polyp, premalignant lesions have 100% specificity and 50% sensitivity, malignancies had 50% sensitivity and 100% specificity. There was a very low sensitivity of hysteroscopy for diagnosis of hyperplasms and polyps. Conclusion: Ultrasound has excellent efficacy for diagnosing submucosous fibroids. Hysteroscopy is very specific but has a very low sensitivity for the diagnosis of hyperplasms, polyps, and premalignant lesions.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Blanco, M., Pacheco, M., Colmenares, R., & Vásquez, L. (2021). Eficacia diagnóstica de la ecografía y la histeroscopia en pacientes con patología endometrial. Revista de Obstetricia y Ginecologia de Venezuela, 81(1), 39–48. https://doi.org/10.51288/00810108

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free