Students’ perceptions of pre-clinical endodontic training with artificial teeth compared to extracted human teeth

49Citations
Citations of this article
61Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Purpose: Artificial teeth have several advantages in pre-clinical endodontics training. This study aimed to compare artificial resin teeth with extracted human teeth, from a student's perspective, during a pre-clinical undergraduate endodontic course for three consecutive academic years (2011—2014). Methods: At the end of the course, students completed a questionnaire that included questions about their perceptions of the difficulty of artificial teeth vs. natural teeth and ranked the perceived advantages of artificial teeth. Results: Participants expressed that all procedures, except obturation, were more difficult to perform on artificial teeth than on natural teeth, a result that was due to the hardness of the resin. They ranked the fairness and availability as the best advantages. Conclusion: Artificial teeth have multiple advantages but cannot replace natural teeth. The physical characteristics through the manufacturing material of artificial teeth should be enhanced to increase wider use and acceptance.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Al-Sudani, D. I., & Basudan, S. O. (2017). Students’ perceptions of pre-clinical endodontic training with artificial teeth compared to extracted human teeth. European Journal of Dental Education, 21(4), e72–e75. https://doi.org/10.1111/eje.12223

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free