Approximation methods in the study of boson stars

34Citations
Citations of this article
11Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

We analyze the accuracy of the variational method in computing physical quantities relevant for gravitationally bound Bose-Einstein condensates. Using a variety of spherically symmetric variational ansätze found in existing literature, we determine physical quantities and compare them to numerical solutions. We conclude that a "linear+exponential" wave function proportional to (1+ξ)exp(-ξ) (where ξ is a dimensionless radial variable) is the best fit for attractive self-interactions along the stable branch of solutions, while for small particle number N it is also the best fit for repulsive self-interactions. For attractive self-interactions along the unstable branch, a single exponential is the best fit for small N, while a sech wave function fits better for large N. The Gaussian wave function ansatz, which is used often in the literature, is exceedingly poor across most of the parameter space, with the exception of repulsive interactions for large N. We investigate a "double exponential" ansatz with a free constant parameter, which is computationally efficient and can be optimized to fit the numerical solutions in different limits. We show that the double exponential can be tuned to fit the sech ansatz, which is computationally slow. We also show how to generalize the addition of free parameters in order to create more computationally efficient ansätze using the double exponential. Determining the best ansatz, according to several comparison parameters, will be important for analytic descriptions of dynamical systems. Finally, we examine the underlying relativistic theory, and critically analyze the Thomas-Fermi approximation often used in the literature.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Eby, J., Leembruggen, M., Street, L., Suranyi, P., & Wijewardhana, L. C. R. (2018). Approximation methods in the study of boson stars. Physical Review D, 98(12). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.98.123013

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free