Comparison of 6-18F-fluorodopamine PET with 123I- metaiodobenzylguanidine and 111In-pentetreotide scintigraphy in localization of nonmetastatic and metastatic pheochromocytoma

148Citations
Citations of this article
45Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

We compared functional imaging modalities including PET with 6- 18F-fluorodopamine (18F-DA) with 123I- metaiodobenzylguanidine (123I-MIBG) and somatostatin receptor scintigraphy (SRS) with 111In-pentetreotide in nonmetastatic and metastatic pheochromocytoma (PHEO). Methods: We studied 25 men and 28 women (mean age ± SD, 44.2 ± 14.2 y) with biochemically proven nonmetastatic (n = 17) or metastatic (n = 36) PHEO. Evaluation included anatomic imaging with CT or MRI and functional imaging that included at least 2 nuclear medicine modalities: 18FDA PET, 123I-MIBG scintigraphy, or SRS. Sensitivity of functional imaging versus anatomic imaging was assessed on a per-patient and a per-region basis. Results: For this available cohort, on a per-patient basis overall sensitivity (combined for nonmetastatic and metastatic PHEO) was 90.2% for 18F-DA PET, 76.0% for 123I-MIBG scintigraphy, and 22.0% for SRS. On a per-region basis, overall sensitivity was 75.4% for 18F-DA PET, 63.4% for 123I-MIBG scintigraphy, and 64.0% for SRS. Conclusion: If available, 18F-DA PET should be used in the evaluation of PHEO, because it is more sensitive than 123I-MIBG scintigraphy or SRS. If 18F-DA PET is not available, 123I-MIBG scintigraphy (for nonmetastatic or adrenal PHEO) and SRS (for metastatic PHEO) should be the first alternative imaging methods to be used. Copyright © 2008 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine, Inc.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Ilias, I., Chen, C. C., Carrasquillo, J. A., Whatley, M., Ling, A., Lazúrová, I., … Pacak, K. (2008). Comparison of 6-18F-fluorodopamine PET with 123I- metaiodobenzylguanidine and 111In-pentetreotide scintigraphy in localization of nonmetastatic and metastatic pheochromocytoma. Journal of Nuclear Medicine, 49(10), 1613–1619. https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.108.052373

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free