Scale and number: Framing an ideology of pastoral plenty in rural Mongolia

5Citations
Citations of this article
5Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Much recent anthropology reflects on how scales are contested and contingent products of heterogeneous social interactions, not the ‘ontological givens’ (sensu Carr and Lempert) described in earlier scholar-ship. This article examines the importance of number in the formation of scales of measurement. It does so regarding a pastoral Mongolian scale of livestock-counting based on the number ten thousand, or tüm[en]: a qualitative-cum-quantitative term suggesting plenty and abundance. Drawing on literature on the anthropology of number, and bringing it into dialogue with studies of scale and ideology, this article argues that number is not just a means for calibrating pre-existing scales. Instead, as some-thing endowed with particular qualities and conceptual stability, number can be mobilized to produce ideologically charged scales of measurement.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Bristley, J. (2020). Scale and number: Framing an ideology of pastoral plenty in rural Mongolia. Social Analysis, 64(1), 63–79. https://doi.org/10.3167/sa.2020.640104

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free