Abstract
Much recent anthropology reflects on how scales are contested and contingent products of heterogeneous social interactions, not the ‘ontological givens’ (sensu Carr and Lempert) described in earlier scholar-ship. This article examines the importance of number in the formation of scales of measurement. It does so regarding a pastoral Mongolian scale of livestock-counting based on the number ten thousand, or tüm[en]: a qualitative-cum-quantitative term suggesting plenty and abundance. Drawing on literature on the anthropology of number, and bringing it into dialogue with studies of scale and ideology, this article argues that number is not just a means for calibrating pre-existing scales. Instead, as some-thing endowed with particular qualities and conceptual stability, number can be mobilized to produce ideologically charged scales of measurement.
Author supplied keywords
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Bristley, J. (2020). Scale and number: Framing an ideology of pastoral plenty in rural Mongolia. Social Analysis, 64(1), 63–79. https://doi.org/10.3167/sa.2020.640104
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.