Patient-Reported Outcomes (PROs) in HIV Infection: Points to Consider and Challenges

16Citations
Citations of this article
30Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Introduction: The aim of this study was to reach consensus on the use of PROs (patient-reported outcome measures) in people living with HIV (PLHIV). Methods: A scientific committee of professionals with experience in PROMs methodology issued recommendations and defined the points to support by evidence. A systematic review of the literature identified the coverage, utility, and psychometric properties of PROMs used in PLHIV. A Delphi survey was launched to measure the degree of agreement with the recommendations of a group of practicing clinicians and a group of patient representatives. Results: Four principles and ten recommendations were issued; however, the results of the Delphi showed significant differences in the opinion between health professionals and PLHIV, and polarization within collectives, hampering consensus. Conclusions: Despite a wealth of evidence on the benefit of PROMs, there are clear barriers to their use by healthcare professionals in HIV care. Intervention on these barriers is paramount to allow truly patient-centered care. Graphical abstract: [Figure not available: see fulltext.]

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Antela, A., Bernardino, J. I., de Quirós, J. C. L. B., Bachiller, P., Fuster-RuizdeApodaca, M. J., Puig, J., … Hermenegildo, M. (2022). Patient-Reported Outcomes (PROs) in HIV Infection: Points to Consider and Challenges. Infectious Diseases and Therapy, 11(5), 2017–2033. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40121-022-00678-w

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free