The effect of Lactobacillus reuteri supplementation in adults with chronic functional constipation: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial

102Citations
Citations of this article
192Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background & Aims: There is a growing interest for the use of probiotics for chronic constipation. A recent randomized controlled trial (RCT) showed a positive effect of Lactobacillus reuteri (L. reuteri) on bowel movement frequency in infants with chronic constipation. Te aim of the present study was to evaluate the effects of L. reuteri in adult patients with functional constipation. Methods: A double-blind, placebo RCT was conducted in 40 adults (18M/22F, 35±15 years) affected by functional constipation according to the Rome III criteria. Patients were randomly assigned to receive a supplementation of L. reuteri (DSM 17938), or matching placebo for 4 weeks. Te increase of bowel movements/week was the primary outcome, while the improvement of stool consistency was the secondary outcome. Results: At week 4, the mean increase in bowel movements/week was 2.6 (SD±1.14, 95% CI:1.6-3.6) in the L. reuteri group and 1.0 (SD±1. 95% CI:0.12-1.88) in the placebo group (p=0.046). At the end of the treatment, the mean bowel movements/week was 5.28±1.93 in the L. reuteri group and 3.89±1.79 in the placebo group. There was a not significant difference in the stool consistency between the two groups. Conclusions: L. reuteri is more effective than the placebo in improving bowel movement frequency in adult patients with functional constipation as previously demonstrated in children, even if it seems to have no effect on stool consistency.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Ojetti, V., Ianiro, G., Tortora, A., D‘angelo, G., di Rienzo, T. A., Bibbò, S., … Gasbarrini, A. (2014). The effect of Lactobacillus reuteri supplementation in adults with chronic functional constipation: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Journal of Gastrointestinal and Liver Diseases, 23(4), 387–391. https://doi.org/10.15403/jgld.2014.1121.234.elr

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free