"Two-week waits" - Are they leading to earlier diagnosis of soft-tissue sarcomas?

11Citations
Citations of this article
9Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Introduction. The two-week wait was established as a potential means of diagnosing malignant tumours earlier. This paper investigated whether these clinics are leading to earlier diagnosis of malignant soft-tissue lumps. Method. We identified all referrals to our centre from a database over a 4-year period. Results. 2225 patients were referred to our unit for investigation of a soft-tissue mass. 576 (26) were referred under the two-week wait criteria. 153 (27) of which were found to have a malignant or borderline malignant diagnosis. 1649 patients were referred nonurgently. 855 (52) of which were diagnosed with a malignant or borderline lesion. The average size at diagnosis was 9.4cm with no difference in size between the different referral routes. Conclusion. There is little evidence that the two-week wait clinic is leading to earlier diagnosis of soft-tissue sarcomas with the majority still being referred nonurgently. Copyright © 2010 W. St. J. Taylor et al.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Grimer, R. J., Taylor, W. S. J., Carter, S. R., Tillman, R. M., Abudu, A., & Jeys, L. (2010). “Two-week waits” - Are they leading to earlier diagnosis of soft-tissue sarcomas? Sarcoma. https://doi.org/10.1155/2010/312648

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free