Abstract
After the expenses scandal, it is time to ask what Members of Parliament are for. The traditional formal arguments are inadequate as they fail to engage with what MPs actually do. A typology is useful in illuminating the different ways in which MPs see their role: as Lickspittles, Loyalists, Localists, Legislators, Loners and Loose Cannons. Current trends in the performance of these roles can be identified, raising questions about the nature of politics and the vitality of Parliament. © The Author 2010. Journal compilation © The Political Quarterly Publishing Co. Ltd. 2010.
Author supplied keywords
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Wright, T. (2010). What are MPs for? Political Quarterly, 81(3), 298–308. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-923X.2010.02100.x
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.