Updated Appropriate Use Criteria for Amyloid and Tau PET

  • Rabinovici G
  • Knopman D
  • Arbizu J
  • et al.
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
12Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: The Alzheimer's Association and Society for Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging convened a Workgroup to update previous Appropriate Use Criteria (AUC) for amyloid PET (Johnson 2013) and develop the first AUC for tau PET. The AUC represent general guidelines and should not be considered a substitute for clinical judgment exercised in the care of individual patients. Method: The Workgroup included 14 researchers with multidisciplinary expertise. Meetings were held between June 2020 and August 2021. Key research questions were identified using the PICOTS framework, triggering an independent systematic literature review. Using established methods (Fitch 2001), the Workgroup identified 17 clinical scenarios in which amyloid/tau PET may be considered. Appropriateness of amyloid and tau PET as independent, stand-alone modalities were ranked for each scenario using a 9-point scale (Table 1). Consensus was achieved using a modified Delphi process. Online surveys were completed iteratively by Workgroup members, followed by discussion, until all votes for each scenario fell within one of the following categories: Appropriate/Uncertain/Rarely Appropriate. Result: As an over-arching principle, amyloid/tau PET should be considered in patients who: (1) have undergone a comprehensive assessment by a dementia expert; (2) Alzheimer's disease (AD) is a diagnostic possibility but uncertainty remains; and (3) knowledge of amyloid/tau PET results is expected to help establish diagnosis and guide patient management. Consensus ratings for clinical scenarios are shown in Table 2. More evidence was available to inform recommendations for amyloid than tau PET. Amyloid PET was considered "Appropriate" to inform diagnosis of MCI or dementia due to suspected AD; clarify diagnosis when CSF biomarkers are equivocal; to inform prognosis in MCI; and to determine eligibility for amyloid-targeting therapies. Tau PET was considered "Appropriate" to clarify diagnosis in patients with MCI/dementia under age 65 or those with atypical presentations; and to inform prognosis in MCI or dementia due to suspected AD. Conclusion: The updated AUC highlight a growing role for amyloid PET and an emerging role for tau PET in the clinical evaluation of cognitively impaired patients. AUC are expected to further evolve based on data from ongoing studies of clinical utility and a rapidly developing therapeutic landscape.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Rabinovici, G. D., Knopman, D. S., Arbizu, J., Benzinger, T. L. S., Donohoe, K., Hansson, O., … Johnson, K. A. (2023). Updated Appropriate Use Criteria for Amyloid and Tau PET. Alzheimer’s & Dementia, 19(S14). https://doi.org/10.1002/alz.078912

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free