Percutaneous drainage of abdominal abscesses: Are large-bore catheters necessary?

38Citations
Citations of this article
15Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Objective: To find out whether small-bore catheters (7 F) are as effective as the 14F sump drains generally used for drainage of abdominal abscesses. Design: Retrospective review. Setting: University hospital, Switzerland. Subjects: 64 patients with intra-abdominal abscesses. Interventions: 40 were drained with 7F pigtail catheters and 24 by 14F sump drains. Results: Drainage was successful in 34/40 (85%) and 20/24 (83%), respectively. There were 3 recurrences in the small-bore and 1 in the large- bore group (p = 0.4). Mean drainage time was 8 (SD 5) days and 11 (SD 11) days, respectively (p = 0.29). One patient (3%) developed a complication in the small-bore group and 2 (8%) in the large-bore group. 4/6 failures in the small-bore group and 1/4 failures in the large-bore group were pancreatic abscesses. Conclusions: We conclude that percutaneous drainage with small- bore catheters is as effective as drainage with bigger tubes.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Röthlin, M. A., Schöb, O., Klotz, H., Candinas, D., & Largiadèr, F. (1998). Percutaneous drainage of abdominal abscesses: Are large-bore catheters necessary? European Journal of Surgery, 164(6), 419–424. https://doi.org/10.1080/110241598750004229

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free