The influence of prostate volume on prostate-specific antigen performance: Implications for the prostate cancer prevention trial outcomes

9Citations
Citations of this article
20Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Purpose: Although showing a 25% reduction in the biopsy prevalence of cancer compared with placebo in the Prostate Cancer PreventionTrial, finasteride was associated with a higher prevalence of high-grade disease. This observationwas driven by "for-cause" biopsies. We sought to understand how volume-dependent changes in prostate-specific antigen test performance characteristics may have contributed. Experimental Design: A retrospective review was done on 1,304 men referred for initial biopsy with a prostate-specific antigen between 4 and 10 ng/mL or an abnormal digital rectal examination. Receiver-operator curves and positive predictive values were ascertained for prostate-specific antigen stratified by diagnosis and prostate volume. Results: The performance of prostate-specific antigen changed for any and high-grade (Gleason, ≥3 + 4) cancer in a volume-specific manner. For anyca ncer, the area under the curve (AUC) decreased from 0.758 to 0.629 to 0.520 as prostate volume increased (<30, 30-50, >50 cm3, respectively). For high-grade cancer, a similar trend was shown (AUC, 0.712, 0.639, and 0.497, respectively). The positive predictive value of a prostate-specific antigen of ≥4 ng/mL was also affected bypr ostate volume. Trends for Gleason ≤6 decreased as prostate volume increased (positive predictive value for <30 cm3, 25.0%; positive predictive value for 30-50 cm3, 23.8%; and positive predictive value for >50 cm 3, 17.3%). A more significant trend was seen for high-grade cancer (positive predictive value for <30 cm3, 39.0%; positive predictive value for 30-50 cm3, 22.3%; and positive predictive value for >50 cm3, 10.7%). Conclusion: Decreases in prostate volume over time and the resultant change in prostate-specific antigen performance characteristics mayhave contributed a bias toward the detection of high-grade disease in the finasteride arm of the Prostate Cancer PreventionTrial. © 2009 American Association for Cancer Research.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Elliott, C. S., Shinghal, R., & Presti, J. C. (2009). The influence of prostate volume on prostate-specific antigen performance: Implications for the prostate cancer prevention trial outcomes. Clinical Cancer Research, 15(14), 4694–4699. https://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-08-2277

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free