Fluticasone propionate 100 μg bid using a non-CFC propellant, HFA 134a, in asthmatic children

11Citations
Citations of this article
20Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: Secondary to phasing out chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs), the fluticasone propionate (FP) pressurized metered-dose inhaler has been formulated in a nonozone-depleting propellant, hydrofluoralkane (HFA) 134a. Objectives: To demonstrate equivalent efficacy and safety of FP 200 μg daily propelled by HFA 134a to FP 200 μg daily propelled by CFCs 11 and 12 over a four-week treatment period in pediatric asthmatic patients. Methods: The study was multinational, randomized, double blind and of parallel group design. Eligible patients aged 16 years and younger were steroid naive or receiving 500 μg/day or less of beclomethasone dipropionate, budesonide or flunisolide, or 250 μg/day or less of inhaled FP. The primary efficacy variable was mean morning peak expiratory flow with equivalence determined if the 90% CIs for the treatment differences between groups were within ±15 L/min. Results: Three hundred fifteen patients (mean age 9.3±2.8 years) were randomly assigned; 158 patients received FP HFA 134a and 157 patients received FP CFC. Over the four-week treatment period, mean morning peak expiratory flow increased from baseline in both groups (14 L/min and 17 L/min, respectively), with a mean treatment difference of -2 L/min. Equivalence was demonstrated between the groups (90% CI -6 to +3 L/min; P=0.589). Both formulations were well tolerated with no serious drug-related events. Conclusions: FP propelled by HFA 134a has equivalent efficacy and comparable safety to FP propelled by CFC propellants at a microgram equivalent dose in pediatric asthmatic patients.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Lyttle, B., Gilles, J., Panov, M., Emeryk, A., & Wixon, C. (2003). Fluticasone propionate 100 μg bid using a non-CFC propellant, HFA 134a, in asthmatic children. Canadian Respiratory Journal, 10(2), 103–109. https://doi.org/10.1155/2003/627531

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free